High-quality traffic with precise targeting

We attracted traffic to our channel, and this experience turned out to be truly impressive. The goal was to gain new subscribers, and we were pleasantly surprised: in a short time, we managed to attract between 500 and 5000 people, depending on the campaign. It's always a bit daunting to explore a new platform, but AdsGram made the process simple and clear. One of the standout features for us was the ad campaign settings — there are numerous options available that allow for precise targeting adjustments. We felt a high degree of control over whom we were reaching, and this significantly impacted audience quality. We needed not just numbers but engaged subscribers genuinely interested in our content, and AdsGram delivered that. We were also impressed by the cost of acquisition: we managed to stay within the range of $0.10 to $0.90 per subscriber, which is quite reasonable compared to other platforms. Speaking of them, the audience quality turned out to be significantly higher than in TGAds. In this respect, AdsGram really stands out. Overall, I highly recommend giving this platform a try if you want to expand your audience. The combination of cost-effectiveness, flexible targeting settings, and high-quality audience sets it apart from competitors. Based on our experience, this was a sound decision that paid off entirely. I look forward to further growing the channel with their help.

We directed traffic to our own TMA to attract new customers. As a result, we gained around 4100 new clients during the campaign period. The moderation process ran smoothly and gave us confidence that the quality of the traffic would remain high. I was especially impressed by the wide range of targeting settings, which allowed us to fine-tune our audience very precisely. The cost of acquisition fluctuated between $0.18 and $0.76 per customer, which proved to be quite cost-effective for our niche. What stood out was the quality of the audience — it delivered significantly better results compared to Rich Ads, providing higher engagement and better overall conversion rates.

I used AdsGram to promote my Telegram channel and gained around 2,000 real subscribers at an average cost of $0.4 per user. The traffic quality was good and I noticed real engagement on my posts. Targeting matched my audience well, and compared to other networks I’ve tried, the results were more consistent. Overall, I’m satisfied with the performance.

We drove traffic to our Telegram Mini App. Our main goal was to attract new users, and we successfully acquired between 500 and 5000 new users. We were especially impressed by the vast array of targeting options that allowed us to precisely reach our desired audience. The cost of acquisition was from 0.9 per user, which is very competitive. What really stood out was the quality of the audience; they turned out to be significantly more engaged and relevant compared to the users we attracted through TGAds. This platform delivered excellent results, and we are very pleased with the overall efficiency and ROMI.

We were driving traffic to our Telegram bot with the goal of acquiring new subscribers. Over the campaign period, we managed to attract around 2,300 new subscribers, which fully met our expectations. I was especially impressed by the detailed targeting settings — it allowed us to fine-tune the audience and reach exactly the users we needed. The moderation process was also smooth and fast, which helped launch campaigns without unnecessary delays. The cost per subscriber ranged between $0.3 and $0.6, which is a very competitive rate considering the quality of traffic. The audience turned out to be far more engaged and responsive compared to what we previously experienced with TGAds. Overall, the results were strong, and we’re satisfied with both the performance and the quality of users we gained.

The goal was to attract subscribers to the channel. I gained over 4000 subscriptions. The audience is active, of high quality, and the engagement is great — better than in TGAds. The cost was $0.2 per subscriber.